Could be a combination of hams wanting to get OTA with the new mode, playing/fighting with integration/configuration (some radios are easy, many more are not), and an 87 page manual.
As a software developer for a couple of decades, RTFM isn't done nearly as much as it needs to, but that's just human nature. -- Thanks, Bill > On July 28, 2019 at 2:10 PM VE3FBZ <ve3...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Why do we have to hold “their” hand. > > In the documentation it says > > > “To avoid QRM from competing callers, it is frequently desirable to > answer a CQ on a different frequency from that of the CQing station. Choose a > Tx frequency that appears to be not in use. The same is true when you > tail-end another QSO.” > > Find an open spot, click hold TX and operate. > > When you change bands make sure you are still clear of other operators. > > Use common sense and courtesy. > > No sense brow beating the ones who do not care - they probably do not > listen anyhow. > > My 2 cents > > > Regards and 73s > VE3FBZ > London Amateur Radio Clubhttp://www.larc.ca > > > > > > On Jul 28, 2019, at 16:45, Jim Nuytens via wsjt-devel < > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > wrote: > > > > > No user interface design will ever be idiot proof. The > supply of idiots far outstrips the supply of programmers. > > > > Sent from my iPad > > > > On Jul 28, 2019, at 11:53 AM, Andy Durbin < a.dur...@msn.com > > mailto:a.dur...@msn.com > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Everyone who uses WSJT-X for FT8 must have > > noticed the number of operators who answer a CQ and then, when the QSO is > > complete, call CQ on the same frequency. Are all these operators really > > stupid or are they being trapped by a weakness in the user interface design? > > > > > > 73, > > > Andy, k3wyc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
