Actually, just discovered that WSKJTx already almost does this. Putting a blank line in the tx5/custom message window during a QSO will cause a tx disable after tx4 - whether you sent the first CQ or not. However, the auto-log window popup does not work unless a tx5/custom non-blank message is sent.
BTW, in testing this on 4 QSO’s, all 4 of my QSO partners sent multiple RRR/RR73’s (after not getting a 73 from me). Al Pawlowski, K6AVP Los Osos, CA USA > Begin forwarded message: > > From: Al Pawlowski <k6...@almont.com> > Subject: Re: Clicking on RR73 produced wrong TX response msg > Date: May 21, 2020 at 09:37:11 PDT > To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > A nice new feature for WSJTx might be to not reset the custom (tx5) message > (to CS 73) for a QSO and instead skip, or end with, tx5 depending on the > message content, i.e. a blank (or *** say) in the window would mean skip - it > might even make sense to make the skip message the default. > > > Al Pawlowski, K6AVP > Los Osos, CA USA > > > >> On May 20, 2020, at 16:52, wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net >> <mailto:wsjt-devel-requ...@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote: >> >> Date: Wed, 20 May 2020 16:51:57 -0700 >> From: Paul Kube <paul.k...@gmail.com <mailto:paul.k...@gmail.com>> >> To: WSJT software development <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net >> <mailto:wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net>> >> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] Clicking on RR73 produced wrong TX response >> msg >> >> On Wed, May 20, 2020 at 2:05 PM Gary McDuffie <mcduf...@ag0n.net >> <mailto:mcduf...@ag0n.net>> wrote: >> >>> >>> If you call letting him know that you got his acknowledgement of your >>> report a courtesy, I guess so. I call it a necessity in order to allow him >>> to move on. If I don?t send the 73, it means I didn?t get his RR73. If he >>> doesn?t finish, he isn?t in the log. >>> >> >> If you didn't get his RR73 (Tx4), certainly the thing to do is to resend >> your report (Tx3), no? >> >> On the other hand, if you did get his RR73, you can consider the QSO >> completed, and respond in whatever way you want. At least, that's the view >> I've come to after using the FT* modes since they were invented. Was it >> "really" a QSO? I'll let LoTW or the contest logcheck software sort it out. >> >> A special case is when I see a station I've worked sending RR73 again. That >> shows they're probably expecting a 73 from me and didn't get it. So in that >> case I'll send 73 (Tx5, which is totally customizable, there's even a TX >> Macros page in Settings that lets you create a whole library of them). But >> that almost never happens anymore. >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
