While true that JTDX will decode a few more signals it comes at a price that
being greater CPU use and it does not have the decode speed of WSJTX. From a
long time JTDX user that uses both programs.
73 Morris WA4MIT
On Friday, July 3, 2020, 11:20:58 PM CDT, Jim Brown
<k...@audiosystemsgroup.com> wrote:
Several members of the Slack VHF group have commented that JTDX is
decoding more signals than 2.2.2. Seeing that, I've started running both
programs in parallel. Since I use VOX, that's easy to do.
What I'm seeing is similar to my experience simultaneously running MMTTY
and 2TONE for RTTY contesting -- either program will catch a decode that
the other misses. The trend I'm seeing with WSJT-X and JTDX 1.51 is that
WSJT-X 2.2.2 misses more decodes than JTDX 1.51.
K5TM reverted to 2.1.2 and observed that the decodes are no longer
missing. His second program is MSHV, because JTDX doesn't do MSK144.
73, Jim K9YC
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
