I want to agree with Jim N2ADV here - WSJT-X is a great application for weak signal work. ACLog/Log4OM/RUMLog are great loggers that will tie to QRZ/HamQTH/a database of US Hams from the FCC's dump/etc, and two of the three are free (plus CQRLog and other tools). In information systems we're moving away from monolithic services/software toward microservice architectures - I see WSJT-X as a weak signal microservice that talks to my logging microservice that might also talk to FLDigi or a SSTV tool.
73, Adam Bartlett N5YHF On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 1:38 PM James Shaver (N2ADV) <[email protected]> wrote: > So many users have so many different tastes that the UI really should be > dedicated to decoding functions vs what are “quality of life” functions. > If you try to sharpen a hammer to make it a knife, you’ll have a mediocre > knife and a terrible hammer. > > Just my 2 cents... > > 73, > > Jim S. > N2ADV > > On Dec 3, 2020, at 2:27 PM, Neil Zampella <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > There are many for Windows, and I'm fairly sure that Gridtracker does a > lookup also, and its available for Linux. > As far as modifying the wsjtx_log file, why? Again, you're adding > complexity to the program that is not really needed, and would add to the > support issues seen here. > > Neil, KN3ILZ > On 12/3/2020 11:37 AM, Dave Slotter, W3DJS wrote: > > You said, "there are plenty of third-party bridge, programs that do this > as do many logging programs" > > Please support your statement with specific examples. > > I would like to know which of these run under Linux and directly modify > the file "wsjtx_log.adi" file. > > Thank you. Regards > > -- > Dave Slotter, W3DJS <https://www.qrz.com/db/W3DJS> > > > On Thu, Dec 3, 2020 at 11:29 AM Neil Zampella <[email protected]> wrote: > >> FWIW ... there are plenty of third-party bridge, programs that do this >> as do many logging programs. Adding something that requires Internet >> access both ways, rather than the PSK Reporter's feed only, may cause >> other issues, as well as add on to the support issues often seen here. >> >> Neil, KN3ILZ >> >> On 12/3/2020 8:38 AM, John Nelson wrote: >> > Dave, >> > >> > Scheme to populate name field in log: good idea but — you suggest >> “full names” where it seems to me “first name” would be sufficient and >> appropriate. Comment? >> > >> > — John G4KLA >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> wsjt-devel mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >> > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel >
_______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
