I would like to see a defined DX window also. Despite the WSJT-X magic ability to separate signals the DX is often buried under the "locals".
73 -Jim NU0C On Fri, 9 Jul 2021 13:59:23 -0400 Joe Taylor <j...@princeton.edu> wrote: > Hi Al, > > As Bill has explained, the WSJT-X Rx bandwidth is currently limited to > 5000 Hz. But I agree that larger FT8 sub-bands (or multiple sub-bands > on a given HF band) are really what is required to relieve congestion. > > -- 73, Joe, K1JT > > On 7/9/2021 11:54 AM, Al Pawlowski wrote: > > Given FT8’s growth, a built-in way to ask for a jump to an clear frequency, > > or channel, certainly seems like a good idea. However, a larger channel is > > what really seems to be needed. This could be accomplished (other mode user > > squawks not considered) by just setting the WSJTx, and radio, rx bandwidths > > higher. With my setup, I can work up to a 4500Hz FT8 channel. If more users > > were to use larger BW, it might be a significant congestion relief. > > > > Though my rig can go to 9999Hz rx BW and WSJTx v2.4.0 set to 6000Hz, > > 4500kHz is all I can get - above that, decodes stop and the waterfall fills > > with noise. I wonder if the limit is due to my CPU speed (usage increases > > with BW and channel activity) or a WSJTx thing. Reports from others doing > > larger BW would be interesting. > > > > > > Al Pawlowski, K6AVP > > Los Osos, CA USA > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
