Too funny, as the rx of both stations covers the entire pan bandwidth,
the fact they are transmitting on a different pan slice within,
does not qualify as 'audio split' in my book. If both were running 300Hz
rx filters then it might qualify on matching tx/tx placement between two
stations
not running rig/fake split.
Both stations can be running very similar audio frequencies and have the
TX offset between then controlled mainly by the RF split frequency offset,
which is what we are talking about. I can work 100Hz to 2900Hz in the
pan keeping audio within 1500 - 2000 HZ , again what Rig split is
designed for.
I often do that re 300Hz Rfil RX with DX peditions, which gives a 20dB
gain on the FTDX101MP here @! 300Hz , while taking out the callers.
Using TX hold should be default behavior, jumping around the pan on
target , has many competing for the same tx marker/timeslot whereas
spread-out calls using the space, work much better for everyone.
73
vk4tux
On 1/5/23 20:52, Jim Shorney wrote:
Apparently this is really hard to understand. When the audio offset of your QSO
partner and your TX audio offset are different your are running audio split.
On Mon, 1 May 2023 15:58:55 +1000
Adrian <vk4...@gmail.com> wrote:
There is no 'audio split' in WSJTX' TX audio is determined by mode, RF
frequency and the TX marker.
RX audio decode covers the pan bandwidth, with the RX marker filtered
for the right pane display.
vk4tux
On 1/5/23 14:45, Jim Shorney via wsjt-devel wrote:
audio split in WSJTX
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
