Reino failed to supply an accurate factual answer to Allan, perhaps it
is not 'so funny' now, however ;
"
*On 20m at 400 TX marker, my FTDX101MP in 'rig split' has TX Sub vfo set
(by wsjtx) at 14.072.500, and uses an audio frequency of 1900Hz (1500
-2000 Hz being the target passband window) ****Sum = 14.074.400, the xxx.400 equating to the the pan indicator.*
*My monitor scope pickup indicates the audio at 1900Hz mean with the CP
frequency at 14.072.500, that are mixed.**The vfo indicates the real CP reference **That is real as the passband filter hardware requires for best signal
quality and level consistency. " Is a factual answer to Allan from
actual facts in the use of wsjtx. The RX receives the whole pan at the
CP band frequency set provided by wsjtx. There is no RX shift and none
needed. The sender TX shift just provides a good quality signal anywhere
on the 3 -4 Khz pan that the receiver detects. *
Yes split function is used, and why change it because a few are hung up
on DXpedition split etc., on other modes.
We are here on FT8, where it applies.
vk4tux
n 9/5/23 20:51, Barry Jackson via wsjt-devel wrote:
Maybe I have not read enough of this tl:dr thread but if this is about
the use of the word 'split' as used to differentiate between the use
of the rig 'split' mode or the single vfo 'fake it' mode then I think
the use of any other word would be incorrect.
Both options produce exactly the same result at the antenna.
The one that uses the rig 'split' mode via hamlib SHOULD be called
'split'.
I disagree with trying to dumb this down for people who can't be
bothered to read the documentation.
The concept is simple enough to grasp for any licensed amateur.
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
