Bo,

I assume you mean vhf and up contests.  On HF CW or Phone, the contest
standard is always 599 or 59.  Which means it is a meaningless part of the
exchange.  Why should FT8/MSK144 be held to a higher standard? At least
they are trying to use some kind of a standard definition for signal
strength.

John K7SYS

On Mon, Mar 11, 2024 at 11:11 AM Bo Nilsson via wsjt-devel <
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:

> Gents,
>
>
>
> As you know both FT8 and MSK144 are very popular modes on 6m, BUT for some
> reason the report sent can change many times during a QSO. The result is
> that both operators can log different reports and still have a valid QSO.
> This sounds crazy to me. Obviously I’m not the only one concerned. In
> several contests these two modes are banned for that reason. (A pity!)
>
>
>
> I’ve heard that one reason for changing the report during a QSO is to
> inform the station you are calling of the current status of received signal
> strength. I don’t see what help we get from this info. There are things
> like QSB, MS bursts, QRM and other things that can change the report 10
> steps or more for one period. With 3 different programs on the market the
> report does not say very much at all, as you don’t know which SW is used by
> the station you work. Some SW is more generous than others.
>
>
>
> I propose that FT8 and MSK144 follow the standard pattern and that reports
> stay unchanged during a QSO.
>
>
>
> 73
>
> Bo
>
> SM7FJE
> _______________________________________________
> wsjt-devel mailing list
> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
>
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel

Reply via email to