Yes, I do if the OTP information does change for each transmission. There is a selection of the interval of the OTP key, default 1, but I don't have an idea what it really means, hi. I have not studied how the new verification system works and my statements are just "educated" guesses.
73, Reino OH3mA > -----Original Message----- > From: Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel <wsjt- > de...@lists.sourceforge.net> > Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 9:44 PM > To: Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel <wsjt- > de...@lists.sourceforge.net> > Cc: Glenn Williams <a...@alumni.caltech.edu> > Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox decoding weak signal > learning #FH > > Hi Reino, > Do you mean every CQ is has different bits? > --73, Glenn, AF8C > > On 9/30/2024 2:36 PM, Reino Talarmo via wsjt-devel > wrote: > > Hi Glenn, > > Without knowing the exact encoding of the superfox > signal I can say > > that the forward error correction and the message error > detection > > parts of the message do change when a single bit is > changed in the > > data portion of the message. There could be exactly the > same bits in > > some part of the message, but as whole the message is > critically > > different for "exactly the same" message. > > With the new OTP information superfox may never send > two bitwise > > exactly same messages, even when the user data is the > same. > > > > 73, Reino OH3mA > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Glenn Williams via wsjt-devel <wsjt- > >> de...@lists.sourceforge.net> > >> Sent: Monday, September 30, 2024 8:20 PM > >> To: wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> Cc: Glenn Williams <a...@alumni.caltech.edu> > >> Subject: Re: [wsjt-devel] SuperFox decoding weak > > signal > >> learning #FH > >> > >> I have been out of the software engineering loop too > > long, > >> so it would be a chore to dig out the answers to the > following > >> questions from the released code. > >> > >> A suggestion for SF decoding? > >> > >> I presume that each time the SuperFox transmits a CQ > > the > >> message that is encoded is exactly the same. I presume > that portions > >> of the signal report and 73 message > > contain > >> exactly the same encoding. I presume therefore that > > the > >> modulation for "exactly the same" data is also exactly > > the > >> same. Therefore once a SuperHound receives those > sections of > >> messages, the software can "learn" what > > tones > >> to expect and where in the stream. So in the case of > > QSB > >> the learned data could be compared to (correlated > > with?) > >> the most recently received audio and thereby an > > improved > >> decode presumption could be supplied. > >> > >> --73, Glenn, AF8C > >> > >> -- > >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast > > antivirus > >> software. > >> www.avast.com > >> > >> > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> wsjt-devel mailing list > >> wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > >> > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > wsjt-devel mailing list > > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel > > > -- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus > software. > www.avast.com > > > _______________________________________________ > wsjt-devel mailing list > wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
