This, IMO, is the best answer. I know that humans like one-size-fits-all/blanket answers but, realistically, the only one-size-fits-all answer is: it depends.
73,
Jim S. N2ADV On Sep 28, 2024, at 10:16 AM, Bill Barrett via wsjt-devel <wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net> wrote:
Perhaps a message to the user:
"Consider experimenting with AGC settings for best SF decoding"
Bill W2PKY Hi all Sometimes AGC is usefull and other times AGC off is better. It has to decided by the user and not by the software. So far I haven't had any problems in decoding any SF signals if they were over -16dB in snr. Condx ain't static It's dynamic so one have to play with AGC/Preamp/Filter/ATT/Notch/Band- Pass to get the best decode. No settings will work every time. One has to take the time to learn what ones radio does with different settings. I spend a lot of times playing with the settings when k8k was operating from American Samoa and that experience came handy when hunting N5J....🙂
73 de 5p1kzx
-------- Oprindelig besked -------- Dato: 28.09.2024 14.29 (GMT+01:00) Emne: Re: [wsjt-devel] AGC affecting SuperFox decoding #FH
Re: Black Michael via wsjt-devel > We need to do some testing but I'm considering changing Hamlib to put all rigs on FAST AGC (if AGC is not OFF) for WSJT-X operation. So a setting of medium or slow would get changed to fast. That sounds like it should be done by wsjtx, not hamlib. 73, Christoph DF7CB _______________________________________________ wsjt-devel mailing list wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.nethttps://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
|
_______________________________________________
wsjt-devel mailing list
wsjt-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wsjt-devel
