Argh ... my bad ... of course we need the BC jar in the lib dir !!! The build is fine on my machine ... :-)
Thanks, Ruchith On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 10:04 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi, > I think the reason for this is the fact that we have removed the bouncy > castle jar from the lib [1] in this commit. Ant when we do an ant jar to > build wss4j picks the jars from the lib directory and bouncycastle is no > longer there. If I put bouncycastle in to the lib, everything works fine. So > shall we include a note in the README.txt that people should download and > copy the bouncycastle to lib before they build wss4j ? > > thanks, > nandana > > [1] - http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=652149 > > On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 9:29 AM, Ruchith Fernando > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hi Fred, >> >> I just tried to build the wss4j-1.5.4 branch and it failed (test >> report attached). >> >> If the release is cut on the latest revision of the branch then I have >> to say -1 until we fix these issues. >> >> Thanks, >> Ruchith >> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 2:18 AM, Fred Dushin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> > Okay, I've fixed the hard-coded references to WSS4J versions in any of >> > the >> > docs, and I've added a ChangeLog.txt, which I generated from Jira. I've >> > also added a Jira report to the maven plugin, so we can see which >> > tickets >> > were closed for 1.5.4. >> > >> > A test version of the site can be found at: >> > >> > http://people.apache.org/~fadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/site/ >> > >> > Note that at present, the release bits have NOT been updated on >> > people.apache.org, and the tags/1_5_4 branch has not been updated, >> > either. >> > >> > Before re-spinning a release, I'd like to take a vote on whether we can >> > release without a fix for >> > >> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-119 >> > >> > I'd say that if WSS-119 is not a regression, then we should release >> > without >> > the fix. OTOH, if there is a strong feeling towards making the fix, >> > then >> > I'd be open to that, too -- it does apparently affect WCF interop, which >> > is >> > pretty important, IMO. It will require that we withdraw the release, >> > and >> > start the test cycle over again. So far, it looks like Axis, CXF, and >> > Tuscany are the parties with a stake in that. (The CXF testing I can do >> > very easily) >> > >> > I can't say how far away we'd be on a 1.5.5, or even a 2.0 release. >> > >> > Also, could I ask whether any WSS4J contributors would like to be listed >> > in >> > the contributors section of the web site? Speak up, and I'll add your >> > name, >> > but I don't want to add names without permission -- well, except for >> > Colm :) >> > >> > -Fred >> > >> > On May 22, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Ruchith Fernando wrote: >> > >> >> Fred, >> >> >> >> Can we get these issues fixed that cut the release again please? >> >> >> >> Thanks, >> >> Ruchith >> >> >> >> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >> wrote: >> >>> >> >>> Hi Fred, >> >>> >> >>> I took a look and would be happy to +1 the release with the following >> >>> comments: >> >>> >> >>> - In the README.txt file, this version number was not updated >> >>> "Thus no specific installation is required. The wss4j-1.5.1.jar file >> >>> could be included into ear or war files of enterprise or web >> >>> application >> >>> servers." >> >>> >> >>> I would recommend not listing an explicit version number in this >> >>> section >> >>> to avoid future problems. >> >>> >> >>> - I could find no change log as to what bug fixes or enhancements >> >>> 1.5.4 >> >>> made over the previous releases. >> >>> >> >>> - The front page for WSS4J has some broken links and lists the current >> >>> release as 1.5.0 when in fact only 1.5.1, 1.5.2 and 1.5.3 are >> >>> available >> >>> from the download site. >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> -- >> >>> Tom Jordahl >> >>> WS PMC member >> >>> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >> >>> From: Fred Dushin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 10:48 AM >> >>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> Cc: wss4j-dev >> >>> Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] release wss4j-1.5.4 >> >>> >> >>> To the Apache Web Services community, >> >>> >> >>> We are currently in the process of a WSS4J 1.5.4 release, but we have >> >>> only gotten 1 +1 vote from an Apache WS PMC member. (The only other >> >>> votes cast have been 2 non-binding +1 votes). >> >>> >> >>> Could I ask Apache WS PMC members to look into this release? >> >>> >> >>> Here is the email trail on the vote: >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-wss4j-dev/200805.mbox/thread >> >>> >> >>> (using the subject "[VOTE] release wss4j-1.5.4") >> >>> >> >>> Many thanks, >> >>> >> >>> Fred Dushin >> >>> (release engineer for the Apache WSS4J 1.5.4 release) >> >>> >> >>> Begin forwarded message: >> >>> >> >>>> From: Fred Dushin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> >>>> Date: May 13, 2008 11:02:41 AM EDT >> >>>> To: wss4j-dev <[email protected]> >> >>>> Subject: [VOTE] release wss4j-1.5.4 >> >>>> >> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >> >>>> Hash: SHA1 >> >>>> >> >>>> This is a call for votes for the wss4j-1.5.4 release. This release >> >>>> has the same set of fixes as RC3, and should only differ in the >> >>>> version name. >> >>>> >> >>>> The distribution can be found at the following URL: >> >>>> >> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~fadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/dist/ >> >>>> >> >>>> You can also point maven at the following URL to pull down the 1.5.4 >> >>>> release POM, source, and class JARs: >> >>>> >> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~fadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/maven/ >> >>>> >> >>>> This vote will stay open for at least 72 hours. >> >>>> >> >>>> Thank you for all the effort made towards this release! >> >>>> >> >>>> Here is my (non-binding and advisory) +1 >> >>>> >> >>>> - -Fred >> >>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) >> >>>> >> >>>> iD8DBQFIKa1LKSQw0yA4Kl8RAoB0AKC+lD69QY4Q6tkwFk1ygWIAjRwuggCfXWA2 >> >>>> 51quHxthvKqCIak6oWoXcDA= >> >>>> =upU1 >> >>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >> >>>> >> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>>> >> >>>> >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> >> >>> >> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >>> >> >>> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> >> http://blog.ruchith.org >> >> http://wso2.org >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> > >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> http://blog.ruchith.org >> http://wso2.org >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- http://blog.ruchith.org http://wso2.org --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
