Hi, If anyone has some code or insight to contribute, please do! All I want to > do is create and EncryptedKey, and stick it in the header (and get the > Signature to reference the key, as well :) >
I applied the patch and added a test case to the branch. I wasn't able to fix the cvs-commit list issue, so they won't appear in commit list. Sorry I didn't know that this test case was the blocking issue for the release until I saw this mail. So I think we are now ready to go. thanks, nandana http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=659918 http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&revision=659915 > > > > On May 23, 2008, at 1:57 PM, Ruchith Fernando wrote: > > Sounds good !! >> >> Thanks, >> Ruchith >> >> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 8:02 PM, Fred Dushin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >>> Okay then. Here is my plan: >>> * Retract the call for votes for the 1.5.4 release to both the wss4j and >>> general lists (with due apologies) >>> * On the 1_5_4 branch, Apply the patch for WSS-119, and obtain or write >>> a >>> test case for it, as none has been submitted yet >>> * Update changelog >>> * Manually test against CXF >>> * re-tag the release (or merge to the 1_5_4 tag) >>> * Spin the bits (including site) >>> * Call for votes >>> I should hopefully be able to get to this today. If anyone has a test >>> case >>> for WSS-119, this will make getting this done today more likely (Note >>> that >>> Monday is a national holiday here in the states) >>> Note that after the vote passes, I will do the normal update procedures >>> to >>> the web site, the distribution download area, and to maven. Before I do >>> that, though, I will merge the changes that went on the fixes branch to >>> the >>> mainline, as the branch and mainline have gone out of sync. At that >>> point, >>> the mainline will be "open" for merges. >>> If there are any objections, please let me know. >>> Thanks, >>> -Fred >>> On May 23, 2008, at 7:22 AM, Nandana Mihindukulasooriya wrote: >>> >>> Hi Devs, >>> Tested the release with the WSS-119 patch Axis2/Rampart and it works >>> fine. >>> >>> thanks, >>> nandana >>> >>> On Fri, May 23, 2008 at 3:21 PM, O hEigeartaigh, Colm >>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> Fred, >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-51 >>>> >>>> and >>>> >>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-54 >>>> >>>> can be closed imo, as the patches have long since been applied. >>>> >>>> +1 to getting a fix for WSS-119 into the release for 1.5.4, but I think >>>> that any other issue that appears should be deferred to 1.5.5 or 2.0. >>>> >>>> Colm. >>>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: Fred Dushin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> Sent: 22 May 2008 21:48 >>>> To: wss4j-dev >>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] release wss4j-1.5.4 >>>> >>>> Okay, I've fixed the hard-coded references to WSS4J versions in any of >>>> the docs, and I've added a ChangeLog.txt, which I generated from >>>> Jira. I've also added a Jira report to the maven plugin, so we can >>>> see which tickets were closed for 1.5.4. >>>> >>>> A test version of the site can be found at: >>>> >>>> http://people.apache.org/~fadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/site/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/site/> >>>> >>>> Note that at present, the release bits have NOT been updated on >>>> people.apache.org, and the tags/1_5_4 branch has not been updated, >>>> either. >>>> >>>> Before re-spinning a release, I'd like to take a vote on whether we >>>> can release without a fix for >>>> >>>> http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WSS-119 >>>> >>>> I'd say that if WSS-119 is not a regression, then we should release >>>> without the fix. OTOH, if there is a strong feeling towards making >>>> the fix, then I'd be open to that, too -- it does apparently affect >>>> WCF interop, which is pretty important, IMO. It will require that we >>>> withdraw the release, and start the test cycle over again. So far, it >>>> looks like Axis, CXF, and Tuscany are the parties with a stake in >>>> that. (The CXF testing I can do very easily) >>>> >>>> I can't say how far away we'd be on a 1.5.5, or even a 2.0 release. >>>> >>>> Also, could I ask whether any WSS4J contributors would like to be >>>> listed in the contributors section of the web site? Speak up, and >>>> I'll add your name, but I don't want to add names without permission >>>> -- well, except for Colm :) >>>> >>>> -Fred >>>> >>>> On May 22, 2008, at 1:00 PM, Ruchith Fernando wrote: >>>> >>>> Fred, >>>>> >>>>> Can we get these issues fixed that cut the release again please? >>>>> >>>>> Thanks, >>>>> Ruchith >>>>> >>>>> On Mon, May 19, 2008 at 11:36 PM, Tom Jordahl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> Hi Fred, >>>>>> >>>>>> I took a look and would be happy to +1 the release with the following >>>>>> comments: >>>>>> >>>>>> - In the README.txt file, this version number was not updated >>>>>> "Thus no specific installation is required. The wss4j-1.5.1.jar file >>>>>> could be included into ear or war files of enterprise or web >>>>>> application >>>>>> servers." >>>>>> >>>>>> I would recommend not listing an explicit version number in this >>>>>> section >>>>>> to avoid future problems. >>>>>> >>>>>> - I could find no change log as to what bug fixes or enhancements >>>>>> 1.5.4 >>>>>> made over the previous releases. >>>>>> >>>>>> - The front page for WSS4J has some broken links and lists the >>>>>> current >>>>>> release as 1.5.0 when in fact only 1.5.1, 1.5.2 and 1.5.3 are >>>>>> available >>>>>> from the download site. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Tom Jordahl >>>>>> WS PMC member >>>>>> >>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>> From: Fred Dushin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 10:48 AM >>>>>> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> Cc: wss4j-dev >>>>>> Subject: Fwd: [VOTE] release wss4j-1.5.4 >>>>>> >>>>>> To the Apache Web Services community, >>>>>> >>>>>> We are currently in the process of a WSS4J 1.5.4 release, but we have >>>>>> only gotten 1 +1 vote from an Apache WS PMC member. (The only other >>>>>> votes cast have been 2 non-binding +1 votes). >>>>>> >>>>>> Could I ask Apache WS PMC members to look into this release? >>>>>> >>>>>> Here is the email trail on the vote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>> http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/ws-wss4j-dev/200805.mbox/thread >>>> >>>>> >>>>>> (using the subject "[VOTE] release wss4j-1.5.4") >>>>>> >>>>>> Many thanks, >>>>>> >>>>>> Fred Dushin >>>>>> (release engineer for the Apache WSS4J 1.5.4 release) >>>>>> >>>>>> Begin forwarded message: >>>>>> >>>>>> From: Fred Dushin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>>>> Date: May 13, 2008 11:02:41 AM EDT >>>>>>> To: wss4j-dev <[email protected]> >>>>>>> Subject: [VOTE] release wss4j-1.5.4 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- >>>>>>> Hash: SHA1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This is a call for votes for the wss4j-1.5.4 release. This release >>>>>>> has the same set of fixes as RC3, and should only differ in the >>>>>>> version name. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> The distribution can be found at the following URL: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~fadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/dist/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/dist/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can also point maven at the following URL to pull down the 1.5.4 >>>>>>> release POM, source, and class JARs: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~fadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/maven/<http://people.apache.org/%7Efadushin/stage/wss4j/1.5.4/maven/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> This vote will stay open for at least 72 hours. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you for all the effort made towards this release! >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Here is my (non-binding and advisory) +1 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> - -Fred >>>>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>>>> Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> iD8DBQFIKa1LKSQw0yA4Kl8RAoB0AKC+lD69QY4Q6tkwFk1ygWIAjRwuggCfXWA2 >>>>>>> 51quHxthvKqCIak6oWoXcDA= >>>>>>> =upU1 >>>>>>> -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> http://blog.ruchith.org >>>>> http://wso2.org >>>>> >>>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> ---------------------------- >>>> IONA Technologies PLC (registered in Ireland) >>>> Registered Number: 171387 >>>> Registered Address: The IONA Building, Shelbourne Road, Dublin 4, >>>> Ireland >>>> >>>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >> >> -- >> http://blog.ruchith.org >> http://wso2.org >> >> > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
