On Thu, Oct 22, 2009 at 5:03 AM, Tim Koopmans <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi Bret et al, > > Not sure if you've discussed it before but am curious about the choice > of license for watir. > > I was asked the other day about what *type* of oss license watir fits > into, and its suitability for use in an Australian government > workplace. > > I haven't really put much thought into this before so couldn't answer > their question. I was wondering if there were any decisions behind the > choice of licensing and if it's been reviewed since the (c) 2004 - > 2005 timestamp (if it needs a review in any case) > > Regards, > Tim Koopmans > > Chris Morris choose it in the beginning and we've never really given much thought to changing it. It puts fewer restrictions/obligations on users than a GPL-style license. Bret -- Bret Pettichord Lead Developer, Watir, www.watir.com Blog, www.io.com/~wazmo/blog Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord
_______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
