It looks fine. Thanks!

On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 3:49 AM, Angrez Singh <[email protected]> wrote:

> Yeah I pushed it to master. Let me know if that is correct way to do. I am
> having hard time here working with GIT.
>
> - Angrez
>
>
> On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 1:02 AM, Bret Pettichord <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> No they didn't. It looks like you just pushed the close_all method to
>> master.
>>
>> Bret
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:55 AM, Angrez Singh <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Bret,
>>>
>>> Did any of these changes made to 1.6.5 release?
>>>
>>> - Angrez
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 9:50 AM, Bret Pettichord <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://github.com/angrez/watir/commit/f4cb4c22a5c7cc2ee4fa1ba81d6e972cb7d34de0
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:15 PM, Ethan <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Can you link to the github fork in question?
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 00:13, Bret Pettichord <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Wed, Oct 14, 2009 at 11:06 PM, Angrez Singh <[email protected]>wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. In the future, it makes it easier if each change is in a separate
>>>>>>>> commit.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Will do that from next time onwards.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 3. I think i'm fine with close_all and click_no_wait, although i
>>>>>>>> only looked at the code briefly. Do we have tests for these?
>>>>>>>> 4. I'd like to hold off on logon and click_js_popup_button. These
>>>>>>>> appear to be new methods, not in Watir::IE and I'd like to review the 
>>>>>>>> method
>>>>>>>> names and signatures, and consider these for 1.7.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> We need click_js_popup_button method to click the buttons on
>>>>>>> javascript alerts. Thats why I added click_no_wait method. Earlier pop 
>>>>>>> up
>>>>>>> handling was different. So I think we should either add all or just
>>>>>>> close_all method. Yes there are unit test cases of each new function.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think the method for doing this is different in Watir::IE. I'm
>>>>>> wondering if we want to introduce an inconsistency here.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Bret
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Bret Pettichord
>>>>>> Lead Developer, Watir, www.watir.com
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Blog, www.io.com/~wazmo/blog <http://www.io.com/%7Ewazmo/blog>
>>>>>> Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Wtr-development mailing list
>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Wtr-development mailing list
>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Bret Pettichord
>>>> Lead Developer, Watir, www.watir.com
>>>>
>>>> Blog, www.io.com/~wazmo/blog <http://www.io.com/%7Ewazmo/blog>
>>>> Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Wtr-development mailing list
>>>> [email protected]
>>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Wtr-development mailing list
>>> [email protected]
>>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Bret Pettichord
>> Lead Developer, Watir, www.watir.com
>>
>> Blog, www.io.com/~wazmo/blog <http://www.io.com/%7Ewazmo/blog>
>> Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Wtr-development mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Wtr-development mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
>



-- 
Bret Pettichord
Lead Developer, Watir, www.watir.com

Blog, www.io.com/~wazmo/blog
Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord
_______________________________________________
Wtr-development mailing list
[email protected]
http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development

Reply via email to