Yes, I agree with Bret in keeping it simple. I am happy to make the changes if there are no objections.
Cheers, Alister Scott Brisbane, Australia Watir Wiki Master: http://watir.com Blog: http://watirmelon.com Google: http://www.google.com/profiles/alister.scott LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/alisterscott On 26/04/2010, at 8:08 AM, Bret Pettichord <[email protected]> wrote: I think part of the problem is that the rest of the Watir.com website focuses on supporting the production releases of iewatir/firewatir, but the platform page talks a lot about more experimental stuff. I recently had a conversation with the Director of QA at Convio (who had read Alister's recent blog post) and things didn't really make sense to him until I said that Watir.com contained a lot of hype. What would happen if we just said Watir is supported on IE and Firefox and support for other browsers is in development? Bret On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 6:12 AM, Željko Filipin < [email protected]> wrote: > On Fri, Apr 23, 2010 at 12:03 PM, Jarmo <jarmo.plgmail.com<[email protected]>> > wrote: > > Maybe just add a note that it's under development phase and everything > > might not work yet or something. > > Good point. I thought "prerelease" would be enough, but it is better to be > explicit. I have added "watir-webdriver is in early development and > everything might not work yet." > > Željko > > _______________________________________________ > Wtr-development mailing list > [email protected] > http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development > -- Bret Pettichord Lead Developer, Watir, www.watir.com Blog, www.io.com/~wazmo/blog Twitter, www.twitter.com/bpettichord _______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
_______________________________________________ Wtr-development mailing list [email protected] http://rubyforge.org/mailman/listinfo/wtr-development
