Well I can understand the arguments for both sides. Having them all inclusive keeps attendance up, and encourages teams to participate all season and not just go to whats close by. However yeah, things happen and not everyone can go to everything, or has a bad race.
Why not just upping the percentages to say 80% and 75% for team / individual. On Dec 9, 11:15 am, "Ryan Post" <[email protected]> wrote: > That’s the same as its always been. Top 4 from each gender+category count. > That's why VT crushed during MTB season; they had 4 in every category. > > But that’s not the change. The big part about the change is EVERY RACE > COUNTS. Meaning, this road season, there are 10 weekends, with approx 25 > events. Every single event is going to count (team and individual). Want to > skip ASU for the Morgantown RR, well, that's gonna hurt. Have an exam on > some Monday, or a field trip one weekend, that’s gonna hurt. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > Behalf Of Brian DeCann > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 11:32 PM > To: WVU Cycling > Subject: [WVU Cycling] Re: Conference Scoring Changes > > So basically, the difference is that the proposed change has all of > the top 4 in each category count. > > On Dec 8, 10:17 pm, "Ryan Post" <[email protected]> wrote: > > Currently top 2/3s of races for a team, and top 1/2 of races for > individuals > > count. There's 2-5 races per weekend. > > > Points scale is slightly different, but I doubt anyone cares about that. > > (Dual conf would likely go away) > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > > > Behalf Of Brian DeCann > > Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2010 9:57 PM > > To: WVU Cycling > > Subject: [WVU Cycling] Re: Conference Scoring Changes > > > How is that form different than what they do now? > > > On Dec 8, 8:08 pm, "Ryan Post" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Most of you probably have no idea how individual and team points are > > > calculated in the conference, but there will most likely be a change > > either > > > this upcoming road season, or next MTB season. > > > > The basic idea is that [1] ALL races will count [2] team points will be > > > based on winning the weekend, not per event [3]Points scales will > change, > > > and current trend seems to be an L. Though S has been mentioned, and > > linear > > > is also an option. > > > > I'm looking for constructive critisms for or against these changes. But > > keep > > > in mind, this is also design to create a uniform scoring system for all > > > conferences. > > > > Uniform Scoring.pdf > > > 360KViewDownload
