On Nov 21, 2007, at 11:53 AM, Dan Connolly wrote:
Thanks, Gregory, for scribing...
Topics
1. Convene HTML WG meeting of 2007-11-16T17:00:00Z
2. ISSUE-18 html-design-principles HTML Design Principles
3. ISSUE-19 html5-spec HTML 5 specification release(s)
4. ISSUE-15 immediate-mode-graphics requirement for Immediate Mode
Graphics and canvas element
5. ISSUE-14 aria-role Integration of WAI-ARIA roles into HTML5
6. ISSUE-16 offline-applications-sql offline applications and data
synchronization
7. outcome of HTML for authors session
full text: http://www.w3.org/2007/11/16-html-wg-minutes
The minutes say this:
<DanC> http://www.w3.org/html/wg/tracker/issues/19
DanC: had conversation with PTaylor about formal objection - action done
... completed action to email negative and non-responders - done
Chairs have said the question does not carry -- WG will keep working
on spec
<DanC> DanC found out non-responders are not ok to publish
I'd like to ask for some clarifications.
1) Which non-responders are not ok to publish? What are their specific
objections and how can they be addressed?
2) Does this decision apply to the diffs document as well (which was a
separate question in the survey)?
Also, I'd appreciate it if the chairs could clearly state the decision
and the reasoning behind it on public-html for discussion, since not
everyone may have spotted it in the minutes.
Regards,
Maciej
