On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 21:46:07 +0100, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Anne van Kesteren wrote:
On Fri, 30 Nov 2007 17:59:04 +0100, Sam Ruby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I'm ashamed to say that if there is a circular dependency involving
offline, it isn't obvious to this reader, and I would greatly
appreciate it some kind soul would point it out.
Search for "manifest" throughout the specification and look at the
fifth paragraph of the second subsection of #offline which is quite
explicit about this. I guess I shouldn't be shocked by people not
reading the specification, but when asking specific questions like this
it would sort of help to first check, I think.
raise Exception("Rudeness")
I had the same feeling when you repeatedly asked this question over and
over again.
(It is also not clear to me why not having an answer to this question
in any way delays your review of the introductory note Ian and I wrote.)
I was going to look into this further, but as you seem to be in a hurry,
I guess the following will have to do:
No. SQL and offline application caching APIs would clearly be
a good thing; my only issue is the scope question. Please
treat this answer as if it were "yes, but only if the charter
was modified first".
I don't see how this is a review of the relevant note. This seems more
like an opinion on whether the HTML5 specification should contain those
features, but it is good to know that you consider those features to be
out of scope, thanks.
--
Anne van Kesteren
<http://annevankesteren.nl/>
<http://www.opera.com/>
