> First, any good design process is not democratic, rather something closer to > a meritocracy. All voices are not and should not be equal. Whether this > works out to be a good thing or bad thing depends where the weight lands, > and how it is used. :)
Agreed. > Second, some folk - of which I am one - are coming to the opinion that XHTML > in the web browser is looking more like an evolutionary dead-end, not > "leading the web to it's full potential". Seemed like a good idea at one > time, but on further examination, not so much. Clearly this is a judgement > call. There are going to be many of these judgement calls. A practical > standard cannot be a union of all possibly-workable ideas. Also agreed. I had written something along these lines, but tossed it, so thanks for writing it here :) <...> -- Regards, Rimantas -- http://rimantas.com/
