Just for the record.

Le 25 déc. 2007 à 06:44, Preston L. Bannister a écrit :
Things are a little non-obvious. I suspect this has mostly to do with trying to invent a new process (for W3C) on the fly - nothing inherently bad.


The W3C Process document has *always* evolved with the need of communities. It gives a reasonable stability and at the same time, it is being adjusted when needed. The HTML WG is *right now* operating under the requirements of W3C Process Document.

--
Karl Dubost - W3C
http://www.w3.org/QA/
Be Strict To Be Cool






Reply via email to