Chris, To put it very simply what we have all have preferred from the beginning is for the comments to be posted *directly to the list* in PLAIN TEXT the way we have handled the rest of the communication around this.
Is there some reason you guys can't manage to find a way to do that? --Mike Chris Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, 2008-06-13 09:56 -0700: > Out of curiousity, why would you want a proprietary-format copy of the paper? > > From: Arthur Barstow [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 3:58 AM > To: Sunava Dutta; Michael Champion; Chris Wilson > Cc: Rigo Wenning; Charles McCathieNevile; Doug Schepers; Mike Smith; > [email protected] > Subject: URGENT: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from > MS] > Importance: High > > All - please address this request ASAP i.e. today. > > This input is already overdue by one week and the f2f meeting is only two > weeks away. > > -Regards, Art Barstow > > > Begin forwarded message: > > > From: "ext Rigo Wenning" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > Date: June 12, 2008 5:06:01 PM EDT > To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > Cc: "Barstow Art (Nokia-OCTO/Boston)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL > PROTECTED]>>, <[EMAIL PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>, <[EMAIL > PROTECTED]<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> > Subject: Re: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier feedback from MS] > > Dear all, > > I've looked at the click-through license of the Microsoft Public > License. The license has some viral effects and if the specification > you are producing here will re-use parts of Microsoft's document, we > may end up in a situation where the Recommendation would also have to > carry the MS-Public license because of the click-through. > > I would rather like to avoid such a confusing situation. So if this > document is not only for reading, I would kindly ask Microsoft to > provide the document either in member space or in public space as a > contribution within the framework of the work of this group. This > would allow all to work in the context they expect. The contribution > can be done by sending the document to the mailing-list or adding it > to the wiki with a comment that it is designated to be input and > contribution to the WebAPI work. > > Would that be feasible? I think that was what Art requested in the > message cited below. > > Best, > > Rigo Wenning > W3C Staff counsel > > Art Barstow wrote: > Sunava - as requested by several members of the WG, please send a > PDF > version of this document directly to the public-webapps mail list. > > -Thanks, Art Barstow > > -- Michael(tm) Smith http://people.w3.org/mike/ http://sideshowbarker.net/
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
