I see. I'm sorry, I was unaware until 5 minutes ago that the publishing process of this turned it into an XPS-or-PDF choice. That's...unfortunate, and should be repaired.
(As an aside, could you little-r me and give me your take on why plaintext is preferable to HTML?) > -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Hickson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, June 13, 2008 10:25 AM > To: Chris Wilson > Cc: Michael(tm) Smith; Arthur Barstow; Sunava Dutta; Michael Champion; > Rigo Wenning; Charles McCathieNevile; Doug Schepers; [email protected] > Subject: RE: URGENT: Need PDF of MS' input [Was Re: Seeking earlier > feedback from MS] > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2008, Chris Wilson wrote: > > > > I asked specifically why a PROPRIETARY format copy of the document > was > > being requested (by Art). I'd expect HTML, personally, not > plaintext; > > I don't quite understand why we can't at least agree on HTML4.01 as a > > basic document interchange format. > > The versions available right now are PDF and XPS. I believe Art was > asking > for the PDF version simply because that would be simpler for you than > sending it in an open format like HTML, or, preferably, plain text. > > -- > Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. > fL > http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ > ,. > Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`- > .;.'
