Doug,
your response is an assertion of belief, not evidence in a coherent
argument.
Where is the single document that outlines the case for the SVG
specifications and provides evidence that the current specifications
meet the needs outlined?
it appears you cannot point to such a document.
the SVGWG charter appears not to consider end-users** at all, as they
are not mentioned.
It's hard if not impossible to imagine how the SVGWG deliverables will
further W3C stated objectives** without some included evidence of
intention.
regards
Jonathan Chetwynd
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.openicon.org/
+44 (0) 20 7978 1764
http://www.w3.org/1998/02/Potential.html
The first phase of the Web is human communication though shared
knowledge.
communication is a two way process, which involves everyone in the
authoring process.
http://www.w3.org/Consortium/Points/
W3C's mission is to lead the Web to its full potential, which it does
by developing technologies (specifications, guidelines, software, and
tools) that will create a forum for information, commerce,
inspiration, independent thought, and collective understanding.
Today this universe benefits society by enabling new forms of human
communication and opportunities to share knowledge. One of W3C's
primary goals is to make these benefits available to all people,
whatever their hardware, software, network infrastructure, native
language, culture, geographical location, or physical or mental
ability.
What evidence do you have that the current specifications are helping
us develop authoring tools for 'all people'.
