Julian Reschke wrote:
Julian Reschke wrote:
As far as I can tell, this is not accurate. There is feedback he said
he got (and I believe him) that he doesn't share with us because he
was told not to.
That's not really an issue, and there is nothing Ian can do to stop
someone from sending him feedback, lots of people have his email
address. I do know that he prefers everything to be sent to a public
archive. The important thing to note here is that he doesn't discuss
changes to the spec privately, meaning he makes all decisions publicly.
It's hard to argue about feedback we can't see.
You don't have to argue about that feedback. Ian wont edit the spec
without supplying publicly archived rationale for those changes, and if
you don't agree with what's changed then simply ask him to explain his
rationale in further detail. I'm sure if you can provide new
evidence/feedback he'll change the spec accordingly.
--
Dean Edridge
