Dean Edridge wrote:
That's not really an issue, and there is nothing Ian can do to stop
someone from sending him feedback, lots of people have his email
address. I do know that he prefers everything to be sent to a public
archive. The important thing to note here is that he doesn't discuss
changes to the spec privately, meaning he makes all decisions publicly.
That makes it sound as if these private conversations are indeed
one-way. Are they, Ian?
...
You don't have to argue about that feedback. Ian wont edit the spec
without supplying publicly archived rationale for those changes, and if
you don't agree with what's changed then simply ask him to explain his
rationale in further detail. I'm sure if you can provide new
evidence/feedback he'll change the spec accordingly.
...
Dean, I note that you apparently changed your opinion about thus by 180
degrees since last December. Apparently your experience with the process
was better than mine.
BR, Julian
