At 10:39 AM 5/12/2009 +0200, Dan Brickley wrote: >On 12/5/09 01:41, Renato Iannella wrote: >> >>Can we move forward on the idea of creating a W3C vCard/RDF Interest >>Group Note (that merges the W3C Member submission and the "An Ontology >>for vCards") as a task of the Semantic Web Interest Group? ... >... I suggest the Social Web XG as a mechanism for tracking this effort, even >if the document surfaces as a SWIG Note, since SWXG meets regularly with >minutes, agendas etc while SWIG doesn't have that kind of a mechanism. Enough >SWIG folk are engaged in this discussion (now and over the years) that I don't >see a problem with doing the update under SWIG.
That seems a reasonable approach to me if the XG chairs concur. A named SWIG Task Force would likely be expected to coordinate with the XG anyway.
