And of course, since yesterday, we have to take Google's vcard ontology
into account:
http://rdf.data-vocabulary.org/rdf.xml
Cheers,
Peter
Harry Halpin wrote:
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 1:03 AM, Renato Iannella <[email protected]> wrote:
On 12 May 2009, at 18:39, Dan Brickley wrote:
If others amongst you will be there, why don't you get together and try
to make some progress there? I suggest the Social Web XG as a mechanism
for tracking this effort, even if the document surfaces as a SWIG Note,
since SWXG meets regularly with minutes, agendas etc while SWIG doesn't
have that kind of a mechanism. Enough SWIG folk are engaged in this
discussion (now and over the years) that I don't see a problem with
doing the update under SWIG.
I'll be at Heraklion for ESWC2009, and also of courese in SWXG. Would
like to merge, will have to re-read both vCard Notes and try to see
what way they can be combined. Off the top of my head, it appears the
first Note demonstrates the use of RDF containers, while the second
aims for simplicity. We could just aim for simplicity while still
showing how RDF containers can be used to help deal with the complex
cases. The main keys will be to normalise property names and deal with
any actual incompatibilities, which I assume are few.
Great ... see u there!
Cheers... Renato Iannella
NICTA
