On Thu, 2009-09-17 at 10:36 +0200, Martin Hepp (UniBW) wrote:
> I don't know whether I am in the Linked Data scene ;-), but I am
> convinced that bNodes can be useful.
As far as I'm concerned a bNode is just a resource that nobody's
bothered to give a URI... yet.
I don't think that the vCard vocab should be *insisting* that these are
bNodes rather than URIs. e.g. the following should be essentially the
same as far as vCard vocab consumers are concerned:
<#me> v:tel [ a v:Home ; rdf:value "123456789" ] .
and:
<#me> v:tel <#homePhone> .
<#homePhone> a v:Home ; rdf:value "123456789" .
Indeed, it annoys me that [...] in SPARQL doesn't match nodes which have
URIs. It's unintuitive.
I'm CCing public-rdf-dawg-comments.
--
Toby A Inkster
<mailto:m...@tobyinkster.co.uk>
<http://tobyinkster.co.uk>
