On Wed, Feb 27, 2013 at 10:02 AM, Paul Groth <[email protected]> wrote: > Have we come to a conclusion on this? > > We need to decide to let people go through the staging process. > > I'm in favor of prov:has_provenance . As this is a purely syntactic change > from what we already had.
OK, you have my +1 at least, given GKs concern over almost looking like a class name which I had not thought about. We should settle this soon! GK, I guess you would be updating the PAQ drafts as well. -- Stian Soiland-Reyes, myGrid team School of Computer Science The University of Manchester
