There appears to have been some confusion here. The WG Decision clearly stated the LC period and asked that the end date be made relative to the publication date.
/paulc Sent from my Windows Phone ________________________________ From: Michael[tm] Smith Sent: 20/08/2013 9:02 AM To: Paul Cotton Cc: Robin Berjon (ro...@w3.org); Aaron Colwell <acolw...@google.com> (acolw...@google.com); Adrian Bateman; Mark Watson; Sam Ruby (ru...@intertwingly.net); www-archive@w3.org Subject: Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the “Media Source Extensions” specification Hi Paul, Paul Cotton <paul.cot...@microsoft.com>, 2013-08-19 22:41 +0000: > > The MSE Editors are requested to arrange for publication with Robin and/or > > Mike > > When will the MSE Last Call spec be published? Is it going to be > published before next week’s publishing moratorium? No. I sent a reply last week off-list to the editors saying that before we can publish the LCWD, we need for the editors/chairs to set an end date/deadline for LC comments. We can't publish the LCWD now before September 5, and the LC-comments end date needs to be at least 3 weeks after that, so that means an end date of September 26th at the earliest -- though I'd suggest it'd probably be prudent to have an LC comments period longer than 3 weeks. --Mike -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
