Hi Paul, OK, so we can publish on September 5 with an LC-comments end date of October 17.
--Mike Paul Cotton <paul.cot...@microsoft.com>, 2013-08-20 01:23 +0000: > There appears to have been some confusion here. The WG Decision clearly > stated the LC period and asked that the end date be made relative to the > publication date. > > /paulc > > Sent from my Windows Phone > ________________________________ > From: Michael[tm] Smith > Sent: 20/08/2013 9:02 AM > To: Paul Cotton > Cc: Robin Berjon (ro...@w3.org); Aaron Colwell <acolw...@google.com> > (acolw...@google.com); Adrian Bateman; Mark Watson; Sam Ruby > (ru...@intertwingly.net); www-archive@w3.org > Subject: Re: FW: WG Decision to publish a Last Call Working Draft of the > “Media Source Extensions” specification > > Hi Paul, > > Paul Cotton <paul.cot...@microsoft.com>, 2013-08-19 22:41 +0000: > > > > The MSE Editors are requested to arrange for publication with Robin > > > and/or Mike > > > > When will the MSE Last Call spec be published? Is it going to be > > published before next week’s publishing moratorium? > > No. I sent a reply last week off-list to the editors saying that before we > can publish the LCWD, we need for the editors/chairs to set an end > date/deadline > for LC comments. We can't publish the LCWD now before September 5, and the > LC-comments end date needs to be at least 3 weeks after that, so that means > an end date of September 26th at the earliest -- though I'd suggest it'd > probably be prudent to have an LC comments period longer than 3 weeks. > > --Mike > -- Michael[tm] Smith http://people.w3.org/mike
