Adding olivier Théreaux,

Le 13 févr. 2007 à 22:57, Ben Adida a écrit :
Which brings up an important topic: validation. It would be good if we
started a discussion on how it might be possible to extend HTML with
extra attributes (and possibly elements, although we can start with
attributes for now). This discussion must involve the validation team,
since the biggest issue for RDFa is that: it breaks nothing in existing browsers, but it breaks the validator. How do we bridge that gap? How do we allow for valid HTML extensions without having to push out a new HTML
recommendation?

RDFa is, for the most part, a simple proposal. The process of getting it
to validate is far too complicated by comparison.

May we (olivier and I) could publish a W3C Team Note with a
        XHTML + RDFa profile
ala An XHTML + MathML + SVG Profile [1]
Or maybe this Task Force could do it, though I'm not sure the previous HTML WG would agree or the HTML CG.

I do not say that it is the right solution, I'm just exploring ideas for now. :)
Olivier might jump in the discussion to say what he thinks.

[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/



--
Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
  QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
     *** Be Strict To Be Cool ***




Reply via email to