The HTML Working Group (still meeting every week, not sure what you mean
about if/when we restart) already has such a profile in development.
Watch this space.
Karl Dubost wrote:
Adding olivier Théreaux,
Le 13 févr. 2007 à 22:57, Ben Adida a écrit :
Which brings up an important topic: validation. It would be good if we
started a discussion on how it might be possible to extend HTML with
extra attributes (and possibly elements, although we can start with
attributes for now). This discussion must involve the validation team,
since the biggest issue for RDFa is that: it breaks nothing in existing
browsers, but it breaks the validator. How do we bridge that gap? How do
we allow for valid HTML extensions without having to push out a new HTML
recommendation?
RDFa is, for the most part, a simple proposal. The process of getting it
to validate is far too complicated by comparison.
May we (olivier and I) could publish a W3C Team Note with a
XHTML + RDFa profile
ala An XHTML + MathML + SVG Profile [1]
Or maybe this Task Force could do it, though I'm not sure the previous
HTML WG would agree or the HTML CG.
I do not say that it is the right solution, I'm just exploring ideas
for now. :)
Olivier might jump in the discussion to say what he thinks.
[1]: http://www.w3.org/TR/XHTMLplusMathMLplusSVG/
--Karl Dubost - http://www.w3.org/People/karl/
W3C Conformance Manager, QA Activity Lead
QA Weblog - http://www.w3.org/QA/
*** Be Strict To Be Cool ***
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
