Thanks - I have updated these in my local copy.
Gregory J. Rosmaita wrote:
aloha, shane!
a few quick editorial nits on the 2008-08-20 editor's draft of the Access
Module:
1) in the first bullet point in the list in section 3.1.4, the strings
"matching element" and "element group" aren't emphasized, as they are
wherever else they occur in the document
2) in the second bullet point, the string "matching element" isn't
emphasized, nor is the string emphasized in the first numbered list item;
3) the strings "focus" and "element group" in the first numbered list
item are not emphasized as they are elsewhere;
4) the strings "focus" "matching element" and "element group" are not
emphasized in the second numbered list item;
5) in the third numbered list item, "no remaining elements groups"
should be "no remaining element groups" -- again, neither instance
of "element groups" in this list item is emphasized.
only noticed because i was groking the document in preparation for
getting the UAWG to devote some time to working on the discoverability
of remapped keys when the character isn't available or isn't contained
in the labelling text for the element for which access has been sent...
gregory.
-------------------------------------------------------
BRAIN, n. An apparatus with which we think we think.
-- Ambrose Bierce, The Devil's Dictionary
-------------------------------------------------------
Gregory J. Rosmaita, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Oedipus' Online Complex: http://my.opera.com/oedipus/
-------------------------------------------------------
--
Shane P. McCarron Phone: +1 763 786-8160 x120
Managing Director Fax: +1 763 786-8180
ApTest Minnesota Inet: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
