* Andrew M. Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [14.12.06 06:21]: > Felix Karpfen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > > I realise that it is unreasonable to ask WWWOFFLE to develop a routine > > for overcoming a "urlview" bug, but there could be an indication in the > > WWWOFFLE lists that the unwanted VT is present. > > > This problem is only one of seeing or not seeing the extra character > in the WWWOFFLE indexes. > That - and my browsing routines - are the problem.
If I view the "WWWOFFLE-cached and fetched" URLs while online, I get: - a WWWOFFLE message "Page not found" in the browser's main window; and - the full URL (with the %09) in the browser's address-bar. Removing the unwanted "%09" and refetching the URL is then easy. And it is only a minor hassle to decide - when offline - which entry in the WWWOFFLE index to select. However, if I do not view the fetched page until offline, all I have is the "Page not found" notification. Then I have to rely on my fading memory to load the URL when online next and then reload after deleting "%09". Showing the unwanted VT in the WWWOFFLE indexes would be a welcome crutch! > > I don't know why urlview has this bug that everybody knows about, but > isn't there an alternative that doesn't have the bug. If there is an alternative, I would welcome to be told. I have looked at alternatives to "mutt + procmail + vim (for replies)"; none - that I have checked - come even close. Thank you for taking the time to reply. Felix -- Felix Karpfen Public Key 72FDF9DF (DH/DSA)
