Hi, On Thu, 06 Mar 2008 05:22:54 +0900, Mads Lindstrøm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> Would it be fair to ask people to install the time package? >> http://hackage.haskell.org/cgi-bin/hackage-scripts/package/time-1.1.2.0 >> > > It would be fair, except that the time-package did not compile easily on > Debian either :( I will try to look more into the issue this weekend. > Maybe I could get the time-package maintainers to fix the issue.
Is this Debian's problem? Doesn't anyone met get same problem on any other Linux's package system? > But a binary package could just use a version without the patch. This > would be the easiest for people. > >> If not, we could conceivably have a ghc-6.6 branch without the patch. > Is it really necessary to create a branch for that? Or maybe it is more > trouble than I think. Could we not just ask people to un-record / revert > the patch? It's two darcs commands. And they could just copy'paste them > from the wiki. I think we have yet another solution. Adding compilation flag for wxdirect by make and c-preprocesser. http://www.haskell.org/ghc/docs/6.6/html/users_guide/options-phases.html#c-pre-processor So, I want to know this problem is common to some Linux's package system. Best Regards, -- shelarcy <shelarcy hotmail.co.jp> http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ wxhaskell-devel mailing list wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
