I have a probably stupid question, but I'll fire it anyways: Would it make sense to have future versions of wxHaskell support Text instead of String ?
David. 2011/9/21 eric.kow <eric....@gmail.com>: > On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 20:57:37 +0100, Dave Tapley wrote: >> Am I correct in recalling that you did some of the work to get wxHaskell >> supporting unicode? > > That's right. Mostly swapping char with w_char > >> Now the good news is that this is almost certainly related to the changes to >> unicode handling in wxWidgets: >> http://docs.wxwidgets.org/2.9/overview_changes_since28.html > > Ouch, seems to make sense. > > Was dimly aware that wxWidgets 3.0 would be changing the string type but > I guess I let wishful thinking fool me into thinking it didn't affect > wxWidgets 2.9 (not really paying enough attention to the numbering) > > -- > Eric Kow <http://erickow.com> > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ > All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a > definitive record of customers, application performance, security > threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes > sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. > http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 > _______________________________________________ > wxhaskell-devel mailing list > wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1 _______________________________________________ wxhaskell-devel mailing list wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
