On Wed, Sep 21, 2011 at 16:36:55 +0200, David Virebayre wrote: > I have a probably stupid question, but I'll fire it anyways:
Hmm, worth a thought. > Would it make sense to have future versions of wxHaskell support Text > instead of String ? Do GUIs typically manipulate large text fields for which this would make sense? Is String a source of overhead for any other reason (ie. lots of text fields)? Do we care if we just of lots of small ones? Is this a matter of convenience for people moving to using a lot more Text in modern Haskell? -- Eric Kow <http://erickow.com>
pgpHdn4s4Trad.pgp
Description: PGP signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ All the data continuously generated in your IT infrastructure contains a definitive record of customers, application performance, security threats, fraudulent activity and more. Splunk takes this data and makes sense of it. Business sense. IT sense. Common sense. http://p.sf.net/sfu/splunk-d2dcopy1
_______________________________________________ wxhaskell-devel mailing list wxhaskell-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-devel
