On Fri, 14 Mar 2008 20:00:54 +0900, Jules Bean <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> "a seq b" doesn't guarantee that evaluate a before b. > > True, but that is not relevant here. It does guarantee that both get > evaluated.
Okay, I see. I confused that. >> return $! x >> return $! image >> return x > > that just uses seq. > > return $! x is just x `seq` return x > > that would add nothign to this code. Ah ... it's my mistake. It just reduce x and image to WHNF. Best Regards, -- shelarcy <shelarcy hotmail.co.jp> http://page.freett.com/shelarcy/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------- This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2008. http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/ _______________________________________________ wxhaskell-users mailing list wxhaskell-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wxhaskell-users
