On Thursday, July 30, 2009, Johan Vromans wrote: > My advice would be to > > a) improve the documentation on how the Wx API docs can (should, must) > be used for wxPerl; > > b) document what Wx classes and functions are part of wxPerl (or not > part of wxPerl if that is easier) -- in the process check that the Wx > API docs reflect wxPerl current status; > > c) documented examples and howtos.
Thank you very much for your advice, Johan. That will help me get started on attacking the problem. But can you clarify what you mean by "API docs reflect wxPerl current status" in your point (b)? Thanks, -- Eric J. Roode
