2009/7/29 Johan Vromans <jvrom...@squirrel.nl>: > "Roode, Eric" <ero...@barrack.com> writes: > >> I'd like to start. Hopefully, I can write stuff that will be helpful >> both to newcomers and to experienced WxPerl users. > > I seriously doubt whether it is worth the effort to write wxPerl > specific API documentation. The standard Wx docs are not hard to > understand once you get used to it. ... > -- Johan
Dude, are you seriously trying to discourage someone from freely adding WxPerl documentation to make things easier for everyone, in favour of propagating the existing terrible state of things? That's f$*%ked up! I can't even see a reason to try and discourage people's efforts. What, are you writing a book on WxPerl and don't want any free competition or something? The current state of getting any WxPerl documentation is mostly rubbish. Looking up the C++ apis and going with a general knowledge that "It's pretty much the same, even if I don't quite understand C++ anyway" is crap. I encourage everyone else to ignore this posts on this subject that claim it's not worth the effort, and now, more than ever, I want to put some together, at least regarding stuff I've done. -- Dodger
