On Tuesday 01 June 2010 02:57:46 pm David P Grove wrote:
> I would try it first avoiding the use of the typedef ArrayD. We sometimes
> have problems with typedefs not always working the same way as the code
> would have worked without the typedef.
>
David,
I can confirm this, but possibly not in the way you would like it.
Commenting the offending function ArrayD_add out, my code was compiling and
working correctly. Replacing ArrayD with Array[double] where appropriate, the
code did no longer compile. The error was in a different part of the code. The
compiler was complaining that it could not set an array element of type
x10.lang.Double with a value of type x10.lang.Double{self == 0.0}.
I lacked the patience to dig into that and thus reverted to the old state
("git reset --hard HEAD"). I would like to stay with the ArrayD type --
unless, of course, if you ask me to provide more details on the above
situation.
Knowing typedefs from other languages like C, C++ or Fortran, they are
supposed to make the code more readable and not influence the language syntax
checker. Is this different with X10 ?
--
Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards
Dr. Christoph Pospiech
High Performance & Parallel Computing
Phone: +49-351 86269826
Mobile: +49-171-765 5871
E-Mail: christoph.pospi...@de.ibm.com
-------------------------------------
IBM Deutschland GmbH
Vorsitzender des Aufsichtsrats: Erich Clementi
Geschäftsführung: Martin Jetter (Vorsitzender),
Reinhard Reschke, Christoph Grandpierre,
Klaus Lintelmann, Michael Diemer, Martina Koederitz
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Ehningen / Registergericht: Amtsgericht Stuttgart, HRB
14562 WEEE-Reg.-Nr. DE 99369940
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
X10-users mailing list
X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users
