Hello again

Well my code works well with 32 and 64 instances and I am running on a
cluster where the nodes have upto 64Gb memory for utilization.
Also I am not receiving an Out of memory error (which I generally received
when some of my programs used to run out of memory).
This code of mine does not require large memory.
Also I am working with Managed X10.
if some of my programs used to run short of memory


On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Benjamin Herta <bhe...@us.ibm.com> wrote:

> The ERRNO 104 suggests that one or more of your processes is exiting
> unexpectedly.  The exit might not be due to the number of threads or
> network links, but instead due to something else, such as running out of
> memory.  Have you checked that you have enough memory to run 128 instances
> of your program on your machine?  Does it run ok with 32, or 64 instances,
> and if it does, how much memory is free?  Are you running native or managed
> X10?
>
>
>   - Ben
>
> [image: Inactive hide details for SUYASH GUPTA ---07/31/2013 12:47:52
> AM---Hello All I am trying to execute an X10 program by setting X]SUYASH
> GUPTA ---07/31/2013 12:47:52 AM---Hello All I am trying to execute an X10
> program by setting X10_NPLACES=128 while the
>
> From: SUYASH GUPTA <dynamic.suy...@gmail.com>
> To: x10-users@lists.sourceforge.net,
> Date: 07/31/2013 12:47 AM
> Subject: [X10-users] Regarding ERRNO=104
> ------------------------------
>
>
>
> Hello All
>
> I am trying to execute an X10 program by setting X10_NPLACES=128 while the
> number of hardware threads I have are 32.
> I know best performance can be achieved only when number of hardware
> threads and X10_NPLACES are set equal but just for some analysis I need
> such an arrangement.
> My program is getting crashed by ERRNO=104 problem.
> Is there some way to avoid it or some patch file to use.
>
> Thanx
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Suyash Gupta
> MS Scholar
> Pace Lab,
> Department of Computer Science & Engineering
> IIT Madras
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Get your SQL database under version control now!
> Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent
> caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under
> version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
> _______________________________________________
> X10-users mailing list
> X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users
>
>


-- 
Regards

Suyash Gupta
MS Scholar
Pace Lab,
Department of Computer Science & Engineering
IIT Madras

<<graycol.gif>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
X10-users mailing list
X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users

Reply via email to