I tried running again and found actually that this issue was coming:
"Unable to load JavaSockets. Forcing single place execution"

Is there any solution for this issue.

Thanx


On Thu, Aug 1, 2013 at 12:37 PM, SUYASH GUPTA <dynamic.suy...@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hello again
>
> Well I tried using the option, but something strange is occurring..
> When I am running on the cluster --- Cluster configuration : Each node of
> the cluster has two Intel E5-2670 2.6GHz processors, each processor has
> eight cores and each core can make use of (up to) two hardware threads ---
> instead of one output I am getting several outputs.
>
> I somehow believe that instead of a single copy of the code, multiple
> copies of the program are getting executed. Such a scenario was never
> encountered by me earlier.
>
> Thanx
>
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:38 PM, Benjamin Herta <bhe...@us.ibm.com>wrote:
>
>> You are now using a different library for communications.  How much this
>> affects the timing of your program depends on how your program uses the
>> network, and whether it's on the critical path.
>>
>> This is a new communication library, so if you end up re-running
>> benchmarks and find it makes a difference in performance, I would be
>> interested to know if those differences are positive or negative.
>>
>>
>>   - Ben
>>
>> [image: Inactive hide details for SUYASH GUPTA ---07/31/2013 01:52:35
>> PM---Hello again Well this method works... There is no more ERRNo]SUYASH
>> GUPTA ---07/31/2013 01:52:35 PM---Hello again Well this method works...
>> There is no more ERRNo=104 problem.
>>
>>
>> From: SUYASH GUPTA <dynamic.suy...@gmail.com>
>> To: Benjamin Herta/Watson/IBM@IBMUS,
>> Cc: x10-users@lists.sourceforge.net
>> Date: 07/31/2013 01:52 PM
>>
>> Subject: Re: [X10-users] Regarding ERRNO=104
>> ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>> Hello again
>>
>> Well this method works... There is no more ERRNo=104 problem.
>> But I wish to know how much affect to the timing of the program shall
>> occur now.
>> I had previously collected few results without using this option and my
>> further results using this option could differ upto what extent.
>>
>> Thanx
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Benjamin Herta 
>> <*bhe...@us.ibm.com*<bhe...@us.ibm.com>>
>> wrote:
>>
>>    You won't see an OutOfMemoryError if the memory problem is reached in
>>    the native portion of the code, not the java portion.
>>
>>    Try adding the argument "-DX10RT_IMPL=JavaSockets" after the x10
>>    command, and let me know if it makes any difference.
>>
>>
>>      - Ben
>>
>>    [image: Inactive hide details for SUYASH GUPTA ---07/31/2013 01:16:51
>>    PM---Hello again Well my code works well with 32 and 64 instances]SUYASH
>>    GUPTA ---07/31/2013 01:16:51 PM---Hello again Well my code works well with
>>    32 and 64 instances and I am running on a
>>
>>    From: SUYASH GUPTA <*dynamic.suy...@gmail.com*<dynamic.suy...@gmail.com>
>>    >
>>    To: Benjamin Herta/Watson/IBM@IBMUS, 
>> *x10-users@lists.sourceforge.net*<x10-users@lists.sourceforge.net>,
>>
>>    Date: 07/31/2013 01:16 PM
>>    Subject: Re: [X10-users] Regarding ERRNO=104
>>
>>
>>    ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>    Hello again
>>
>>    Well my code works well with 32 and 64 instances and I am running on
>>    a cluster where the nodes have upto 64Gb memory for utilization.
>>    Also I am not receiving an Out of memory error (which I generally
>>    received when some of my programs used to run out of memory).
>>    This code of mine does not require large memory.
>>    Also I am working with Managed X10.
>>    if some of my programs used to run short of memory
>>
>>
>>    On Wed, Jul 31, 2013 at 7:38 PM, Benjamin Herta 
>> <*bhe...@us.ibm.com*<bhe...@us.ibm.com>>
>>    wrote:
>>       The ERRNO 104 suggests that one or more of your processes is
>>       exiting unexpectedly.  The exit might not be due to the number of 
>> threads
>>       or network links, but instead due to something else, such as running 
>> out of
>>       memory.  Have you checked that you have enough memory to run 128 
>> instances
>>       of your program on your machine?  Does it run ok with 32, or 64 
>> instances,
>>       and if it does, how much memory is free?  Are you running native or 
>> managed
>>       X10?
>>
>>
>>         - Ben
>>
>>       [image: Inactive hide details for SUYASH GUPTA ---07/31/2013
>>       12:47:52 AM---Hello All I am trying to execute an X10 program by 
>> setting X]SUYASH
>>       GUPTA ---07/31/2013 12:47:52 AM---Hello All I am trying to execute an 
>> X10
>>       program by setting X10_NPLACES=128 while the
>>
>>       From: SUYASH GUPTA 
>> <*dynamic.suy...@gmail.com*<dynamic.suy...@gmail.com>
>>       >
>>       To: *x10-users@lists.sourceforge.net*<x10-users@lists.sourceforge.net>,
>>
>>       Date: 07/31/2013 12:47 AM
>>       Subject: [X10-users] Regarding ERRNO=104
>>       ------------------------------
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>       Hello All
>>
>>       I am trying to execute an X10 program by setting X10_NPLACES=128
>>       while the number of hardware threads I have are 32.
>>       I know best performance can be achieved only when number of
>>       hardware threads and X10_NPLACES are set equal but just for some 
>> analysis I
>>       need such an arrangement.
>>       My program is getting crashed by ERRNO=104 problem.
>>       Is there some way to avoid it or some patch file to use.
>>
>>       Thanx
>>
>>       --
>>       Regards
>>
>>       Suyash Gupta
>>       MS Scholar
>>       Pace Lab,
>>       Department of Computer Science & Engineering
>>       IIT Madras
>>
>>       
>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>       Get your SQL database under version control now!
>>       Version control is standard for application code, but databases
>>       havent
>>       caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases
>>       under
>>       version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find
>>       out.*
>>       **
>>       
>> http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
>>       
>> *<http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk>
>>       _______________________________________________
>>       X10-users mailing list*
>>       **X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net*<X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net>
>>       *
>>       
>> **https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users*<https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>    --
>>    Regards
>>
>>    Suyash Gupta
>>    MS Scholar
>>    Pace Lab,
>>    Department of Computer Science & Engineering
>>    IIT Madras
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Regards
>>
>> Suyash Gupta
>> MS Scholar
>> Pace Lab,
>> Department of Computer Science & Engineering
>> IIT Madras
>>
>>
>
>
> --
> Regards
>
> Suyash Gupta
> MS Scholar
> Pace Lab,
> Department of Computer Science & Engineering
> IIT Madras
>
>


-- 
Regards

Suyash Gupta
MS Scholar
Pace Lab,
Department of Computer Science & Engineering
IIT Madras

<<graycol.gif>>

------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Get your SQL database under version control now!
Version control is standard for application code, but databases havent 
caught up. So what steps can you take to put your SQL databases under 
version control? Why should you start doing it? Read more to find out.
http://pubads.g.doubleclick.net/gampad/clk?id=49501711&iu=/4140/ostg.clktrk
_______________________________________________
X10-users mailing list
X10-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/x10-users

Reply via email to