Ok, in your case I think you should immediately construct the minimum proof-of-concept that provides your basic framework for your intended usage. Then as it proceeds ask questions necessary to get it built. If it works then the rest should just be adding flesh and some extensions.
Gerry
Jun 30, 2010 06:37:11 PM, [email protected] wrote:
Hi Gerry,
On Mi 30 Jun 2010 23:54:18 CEST Gerry Reno wrote:
> * Mike,
> Your enthusiasm is terrific. But you're tending to overwhelm
> everyone with so many questions on so many topics all at once.
I understand that. My problem is, that I have to decide rather quickly
in what respect I can replace LTSP with x2go in a concept I have
written for schools. As the concept will be distributed to a couple of
potential customers soon, I am trying to collect information as a
basis for choice.
> As far as sessions go I think you should look at
> /usr/sbin/x2gocleansessions and read through the various scripts.
> Maybe you've done that.
No I have not done that and I will do. It sounds like it might also be
good to wait for the new package versions.
> You point out good issues but let's take them one or two at a time
> and drill them out rather than get a whole slew of scattered threads
> started.
Yeah, I guess, my requests and questions should rather go into a bugtracker...
> Gerry
Thanks for your hints,
Mike
--
DAS-NETZWERKTEAM
mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen
fon: +49 (4302) 281418, fax: +49 (4302) 281419
eMail-LeseSchreibStunde: wochentags 8h-10h
mail: [email protected], http://das-netzwerkteam.de
freeBusy:
https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
_______________________________________________
X2go-dev mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
_______________________________________________ X2go-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
