Hi Moritz, On Do 27 Jan 2011 18:55:51 CET Moritz Struebe wrote:
Hi Heinz,don't put too much work into it. We already started at https://code.launchpad.net/~siretart/+archive/x2go and it's probably not worth doing it twice. Basically the code is imported from our git-repo ( http://i4git.informatik.uni-erlangen.de/ ) and then built on launchpad. x2goagent gave us some trouble, but we hope it will build tonight. The x2go clients are next on our todo-list. That way we should have a minimal system up and running soon. At the moment we are only building for lenny as this is the plattform we test on. Once everything is running there must be a transition from this "private" environment to a more open one, of course. But we want to be able to walk, before we start running. :)Cheers Morty
as I understand your current way of handling things you are actually forking X2go for a university internal project. I am completely fine with a fork, but the please:
(a) state it officially as a fork (b) name the project differentlyMy main point is that you do not at all cooperate, discuss next steps etc. You are just doing your thing. But maybe I missed part of the discussion (private correspondence?)...
Complete disapproval of your communication methods, Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen fon: +49 (4302) 281418, fax: +49 (4302) 281419 GnuPG Key ID 0xB588399B mail: [email protected], http://das-netzwerkteam.de freeBusy: https://mail.das-netzwerkteam.de/freebusy/m.gabriel%40das-netzwerkteam.de.xfb
pgpDYZiQzmBgO.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Unterschrift
_______________________________________________ X2go-dev mailing list [email protected] https://lists.berlios.de/mailman/listinfo/x2go-dev
