Ignore my last message. I see problem is with my sources directory
still having stuff for vivid instead of wiley.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting.
Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, Robert Dinse wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 10:58:47 -0800 (PST)
From: Robert Dinse <[email protected]>
To: "[utf-8] ukasz Czerpak" <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Seidel <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] X2Go speed (Gb LAN) vs. pure X
I am curious what desktop environment people having problems are using?
I use Mate pretty much exclusively so maybe it's an issue with a different
desktop, or maybe one of server resources, although my workstation is antique
my servers are modern i7-6700k systems maxed out on RAM (64GB).
The only time I experience any issues if I stream 1024p media
fullscreen,
and then it's only an occasional stutter.
I am anxious to try the adaptive option but I am running vivid and the
repository for nightly builds is only for debian / jessie. Is there a
repository for nightly builds for vivid vervit?
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting.
Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, ukasz Czerpak wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 19:45:00 +0100
From: "[utf-8] ukasz Czerpak" <[email protected]>
To: Robert Dinse <[email protected]>
Cc: Stefan Seidel <[email protected]>, [email protected]
Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] X2Go speed (Gb LAN) vs. pure X
That's a good question - maybe the problem is not x2go at all.
Anyway, I found 'adaptive' working better in multi-user environment and
more responsive in both single- and multi-user environments. Most of my
testing was done using Ubuntu as server (within VM - Parallels Desktop).
But my customers have also tested in real and found 'adaptive' behaving
better. IMHO worth trying at least.
ukasz
On 01 Feb 2016, at 18:21, Robert Dinse <[email protected]> wrote:
I don't understand why he is having this problem, when I, with only a
100mb/s LAN and a 20mb/s Comcast cable connection to my servers, and an
antique Power Mac 1.1, am not.
-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-
Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting.
Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers.
See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874.
On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, ukasz Czerpak wrote:
Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:17:56 +0100
From: "[utf-8] ukasz Czerpak" <[email protected]>
To: Stefan Seidel <[email protected]>
Cc: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] X2Go speed (Gb LAN) vs. pure X
Hi,
Have you tried 'adaptive' method with image compression set to ~7? Stable
versions of X2Go client may not support this yet, so you'd need to use
Nightly Builds.
It improved user experience significantly - none of other methods worked
so smoothly.
Best regards,
ukasz
On 14 Jan 2016, at 16:12, Stefan Seidel <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi,
I am currently testing X2Go to be a replacement for our (1GBit/s) LAN
XDMCP setup. I have set up a Jessie X2Go-PXE server VM with a Jessie
chroot env.
It is working in principle, I can get a connection and the advantage of
session suspend/resume is great. (Although I had to remove the
pulseaudio startup from the x2gosessiond to make it work.)
However, I have two problems:
1. How can I set client-specific X11 options? We have clients with
complex multi-monitor setups. Xinerama doesn't seem to be working,
either, once I have set the screens on the client (using Ctrl+Alt+F1,
then xrandr) and connect, the X session only sees one "big" screen.
2. Speed: for small screen updates (menu items etc.) - I would guess <
10k pixels - X2Go is very speedy and responsive. For anything larger
(Google Chrome being a serious offender, as it always updates the whole
rendering area) it is much slower. Even just scrolling in Firefox is
"laggy". Pure X is much faster for these large screen updates. I have
tried various settings, 4k-jpeg is almost acceptable speed-wise but
still not fast enough.
Test setup:
X2Go-Server: Core i7-860 (4x2.8GHz), 24G RAM
X2Go-PXE: VM with 4GHz AMD, 2G RAM
Clients: Pentium D 2.8GHz, 512MB RAM, nVidia Dual-DVI graphics (model
6200 IIRC) with 2 1600x1200 monitors -> 2400x1600 total screen area.
Clients use NOUVEAU and report Chipset: "NVIDIA NV44"
Thanks in advance for any hints,
Stefan
_______________________________________________
x2go-user mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
<http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user>
_______________________________________________
x2go-user mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
