That's a good question - maybe the problem is not x2go at all. Anyway, I found 'adaptive' working better in multi-user environment and more responsive in both single- and multi-user environments. Most of my testing was done using Ubuntu as server (within VM - Parallels Desktop). But my customers have also tested in real and found 'adaptive' behaving better. IMHO worth trying at least.
Łukasz > On 01 Feb 2016, at 18:21, Robert Dinse <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I don't understand why he is having this problem, when I, with only a > 100mb/s LAN and a 20mb/s Comcast cable connection to my servers, and an > antique Power Mac 1.1, am not. > > -_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_-_- > Eskimo North Linux Friendly Internet Access, Shell Accounts, and Hosting. > Knowledgeable human assistance, not telephone trees or script readers. > See our web site: http://www.eskimo.com/ (206) 812-0051 or (800) 246-6874. > > On Mon, 1 Feb 2016, ukasz Czerpak wrote: > >> Date: Mon, 1 Feb 2016 18:17:56 +0100 >> From: "[utf-8] ukasz Czerpak" <[email protected]> >> To: Stefan Seidel <[email protected]> >> Cc: [email protected] >> Subject: Re: [X2Go-User] X2Go speed (Gb LAN) vs. pure X >> Hi, >> >> Have you tried 'adaptive' method with image compression set to ~7? Stable >> versions of X2Go client may not support this yet, so you'd need to use >> Nightly Builds. >> It improved user experience significantly - none of other methods worked so >> smoothly. >> >> Best regards, >> ÿÿukasz >> >>> On 14 Jan 2016, at 16:12, Stefan Seidel <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> I am currently testing X2Go to be a replacement for our (1GBit/s) LAN XDMCP >>> setup. I have set up a Jessie X2Go-PXE server VM with a Jessie chroot env. >>> >>> It is working in principle, I can get a connection and the advantage of >>> session suspend/resume is great. (Although I had to remove the pulseaudio >>> startup from the x2gosessiond to make it work.) >>> >>> However, I have two problems: >>> 1. How can I set client-specific X11 options? We have clients with complex >>> multi-monitor setups. Xinerama doesn't seem to be working, either, once I >>> have set the screens on the client (using Ctrl+Alt+F1, then xrandr) and >>> connect, the X session only sees one "big" screen. >>> >>> 2. Speed: for small screen updates (menu items etc.) - I would guess < 10k >>> pixels - X2Go is very speedy and responsive. For anything larger (Google >>> Chrome being a serious offender, as it always updates the whole rendering >>> area) it is much slower. Even just scrolling in Firefox is "laggy". Pure X >>> is much faster for these large screen updates. I have tried various >>> settings, 4k-jpeg is almost acceptable speed-wise but still not fast enough. >>> >>> Test setup: >>> X2Go-Server: Core i7-860 (4x2.8GHz), 24G RAM >>> X2Go-PXE: VM with 4GHz AMD, 2G RAM >>> Clients: Pentium D 2.8GHz, 512MB RAM, nVidia Dual-DVI graphics (model 6200 >>> IIRC) with 2 1600x1200 monitors -> 2400x1600 total screen area. >>> Clients use NOUVEAU and report Chipset: "NVIDIA NV44" >>> >>> Thanks in advance for any hints, >>> >>> Stefan >>> _______________________________________________ >>> x2go-user mailing list >>> [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> >>> http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user >>> <http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user> _______________________________________________ x2go-user mailing list [email protected] http://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
