With x2gokdrive you only have to deal with images while with bx you have to
implement a X server in the browser.

Uli

Stefan Baur <[email protected]> schrieb am Do., 7. Mai 2020, 08:44:

> Hi Alex,
>
> Am 06.05.20 um 19:57 schrieb Oleksandr Shneyder:
>
> > As you may know, I mostly working now on the development of x2go kdrive,
> > which will be used parallel to NX. The client part of x2go kdrive is
> > quite simple and not depends on Xorg, which makes possible to create the
> > clients for mobile and web platforms. I made some proof of concept and
> > quickly developed a simple HTML5 client which is connecting to
> > x2gokdrive over websockets. I used websockify to connect ws to tcp
> > socket. The client has limited support for mouse and keyboard events, no
> > support for cursors, but it's enough to create the image how it'll work.
> > I attached the screenshot of plasma5 session running in browser tab with
> > libreoffice and youtube video running in browser.
>
>
> This sure looks interesting - but I do wonder, why the kdrive-only
> approach, when we've been discussing/working on an HTML5 client for X2Go
> since the last gathering?
>
> Sounds like unneccessarily doubling the work/reinventing the wheel, and
> this for a partial solution only. *headscratch*
>
> -Stefan
>
>
> --
> BAUR-ITCS UG (haftungsbeschränkt)
> Geschäftsführer: Stefan Baur
> Eichenäckerweg 10, 89081 Ulm | Registergericht Ulm, HRB 724364
> Fon/Fax 0731 40 34 66-36/-35 | USt-IdNr.: DE268653243
>
> _______________________________________________
> x2go-user mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
>
_______________________________________________
x2go-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user

Reply via email to