Hi Stefan, On Do 07 Mai 2020 10:38:11 CEST, Stefan Baur wrote:
Am 07.05.20 um 10:35 schrieb Mike Gabriel: Again, that sounds nice as an add-on, but basic NX support in an HTML5 client should take priority. After all, that's what our sponsors asked for - and not a broker-/multi-server DMZ solution. It's fine to design the solution with a possible broker-add-on in mind, but please don't focus on the broker more than on the NX support.
Why stick to the NX support, if we have a native graphical backend that's html5 compliant.
The NX -> x11vnc -> NoVNC solution will always be worse (slower, more itchy and glitchy).
(and: it should not be a big deal to implement it once we have the web framework around it).
Mike -- DAS-NETZWERKTEAM c\o Technik- und Ökologiezentrum Eckernförde Mike Gabriel, Marienthaler Str. 17, 24340 Eckernförde mobile: +49 (1520) 1976 148 landline: +49 (4351) 850 8940 GnuPG Fingerprint: 9BFB AEE8 6C0A A5FF BF22 0782 9AF4 6B30 2577 1B31 mail: [email protected], http://das-netzwerkteam.de
pgpw5Qij01QoO.pgp
Description: Digitale PGP-Signatur
_______________________________________________ x2go-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.x2go.org/listinfo/x2go-user
